Experiential Graphic Designer
N. R. Serrao
2025
Freelance
2025
Freelance
Through a series of conversations with the client, I sought an “elevator pitch” version of her work. This was a framing she had never previously had cause to develop, but perfect for creating a structure for the infograph. These discussions, combined with flowchart-style storyboard sketches, established the bones of the narrative structure before any visual development began.
The intended audience ranged from academic reviewers to the general public, which shaped every design decision. Information had to be immediately understandable without being reductive. Visual hierarchy, applied through scale, colour, and spacing, was used deliberately to guide the reader through the narrative and distinguish between primary findings and supporting context. A heavily constrasting handwritten typeface, paired with a strong, bold display text helped to create a wide hierarchal range as well. This separated “flavour” text, used mostly for design purposes or context, from heavier information and data.
The storyboard direction evolved considerably once visuals were attached to the narrative, as anticipated, with adjustments made throughout to balance storytelling flow with the constraints of the visualizations that occured to me. I viewed each storyboard piece as ‘modules’ that now needed more than just a title. I condensed and summarized content to succintly carry the narrative, and be design friendly. Within each module, I began to plan how I would balance the legibility and function of the information while still creating something visually compelling.
Frequent revisions were required, shuffling words around to stay within the competition’s word count limit and accommodating the designs. Content was carefully edited to carry the narative and be in line with the “storytellers” aspect of the assignment. Some concepts came during the design, such as the fishing line quite literally “stringing” the segments together.
Maintaining strong contrast ratios for readability — particularly challenging when designing icons and data graphics requiring many shades within a single element
Prioritizing visual hierarchy (through size, colour, and spacing) without distorting or oversimplifying the underlying research data. Graphs and datasets with multiple levels of hierarchy required extra care.
The competition imposed a strict word count limit. The final draft exceeded this limit and required a content revision pass to bring the infographic into compliance while preserving meaning.
Keeping a cohesive visual language across custom-built icons, illustrations, maps, and data graphics.
The submission, and a about a dozen others were selected as a winner, among several hundred entries in the national competition. Another deliverable format option was a video, and of the winners, only one other submission was an infographic.
(Return to Projects)